peer review
美
英 
英汉双解
1. | (对科研、专业成果等作出的)同行评议,同行评估,同侪审查a judgement on a piece of scientific or other professional work by others working in the same area |
| All research proposals are subject to peer review before selection. 所有研究建议均须经过同行评议后再行筛选。 |
英汉解释
英英解释
例句
All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process, at least for the publication of papers.
至少对于论文出版来说,所有这些都会改变传统的同行复审程序。
Sometimes, the opinion is expressed that peer review is no longer necessary in the age of the Internet and electronic publishing.
在网际网路和电了出版的时代,有时公开的讨论,显得同侪评阅是多馀的。
The Research Assessment Exercise, known as the RAE (a form of peer review) seeks to do this every few years.
研究评估考核(RAE,一种同业互查)在这几年已经努力去做这件事了。
The anonymous peer review process is the enemy of scientific creativity, Sir James says.
詹姆斯•布莱克爵士说,匿名同行审查过程是科学创新的敌人。
The tacit security of open source software comes from the concept of "peer review, " borrowed from the scientific community.
开放源码的软件不言而喻的安全性来自于“同级评审”这一从科学界借鉴来的概念。
John would have found comfort in the duplication of these visions by a witness, in the customary manner of peer review.
约翰习惯性的凝望观察,有目击人称他在复制这些景象当中获得了快乐。
Peer review is generally considered to be an invaluable part of the editorial process of biomedical journals.
同侪综述通常被认为是一个宝贵的组成部分的编辑过程的生物医学期刊。
'Anonymous peer review is the enemy of scientific creativity'
“匿名同行审查是科学创新的敌人”
The highest-possible quality is assured by a traditional peer-review system with an Editorial Board and at least two anonymous referees.
采用传统的同行评审制度,有编辑委员会和至少两名匿名评审者,确保最高质量。
colleagues at the same organizational level. This type of review is called a "peer review" .
预演、技术评审和检查可以在同行中进行——相同组织层次的同事。这种评审被称为同行评审。
WANO is considering making peer review compulsory for each new plant opened by one of its members.
WANO正考虑,对其成员建的每一座新核电站实施强制性“同行评审”。
When you've defined specific goals, you will be able to judge whether peer review is truly achieving the results that you require.
当您在定义特定的目标时,您就能够决定同行评审是否真的达到了您所需要的结果。
Program officers from the Department of Defense have more latitude on awards but they still use peer review to help support their decisions.
国防部的项目官员对基金审批有更多的自主权,尽管如此,他们做决定时也会参考同行评议的意见。
Some questions come immediately to mind: why was their research not published in scientific journals and opened up for peer review?
这使我们立即想到一些问题:为什么他们的研究没有发表在科学刊物上,为什么没有接受同领域学者进行审查?
In short, the thesis (to be published after peer-review, later this fall) is about if and how blogs can help Iran to move towards democracy.
简单的说,这篇论文(今年秋天,经过同侪审查后将发表)是关于伊朗的博客是否、以及如何协助伊朗迈向民主。
Manuscripts submitted for peer review publication may be rejected for a number of different reasons, most of which are avoidable.
论文在审查中可能会因为各种原因而被拒,而其中大部分原因是可以避免的。
And the scientific method, with its laborious procedures and peer review, ensures we won't know for certain in the foreseeable future.
而科学手段,由于充满了繁琐的步骤以及需要同行的验证,已经使我们无法在可预见的未来里找到答案。
The findings, published in the peer review journal Nature today, have prompted calls for a radical rethink on tackling climate change.
上述研究结果发表在4月30日的同行评审期刊《自然》(Nature)杂志上,这些发现已促使人们呼吁,对应对气候变化的方式进行彻底反思。
The process of peer review means journalists can usually assume that published work is of a high standard and worth reporting.
有了同行评议的过程,意味着记者能够假设已出版论文是高质量并且值得报道的。
" NEJM's editors said in a statement that they are " pleased that the confidentiality of the peer-review process remains intact.
NEJM的编辑在一份声明中说“请不要损害同行评审过程的机密性。”
He became the very model of a modern major scientist without benefit of graduate school, grants or even much peer review.
他成了现代的大多数没有享有研究院津贴、专项拨款或甚至是大量同业审查的科学家的真正典范。
Peer Review is considered to be domestic and international science fund project selection process is the most critical.
同行评议被认为是国内外科学基金项目评审程序中的最关键一环,是科研项目评审制度的生命线。
"It's very heavy-handed of the OMB to come in and regulate peer review, " Waxman charges.
华克斯曼指称:「OMB想介入并管理同侪审查是非常霸道的做法。」
Peer review is a powerful tool for sharing knowledge of an implementation, and streamlining it to be more robust and maintainable.
同行审查是一个共享实现知识的强大的工具,它能够使系统代码更加强壮和可维护。
While an essential cornerstone of science, peer-review "is not foolproof, " as the founders of Real Climate explained a long while back.
但作为科学的必要基石,同业互评“并不是绝对正确的”,真实气候(RealClimate)的创始人们在很久以前就解释过这一点。
It is widely assumed that peer review has positive effects on the quality of submitted papers and of biomedical research.
人们普遍认为,同侪综述了积极影响提交了论文的质量和生物医学研究。
Peer review innovation because by definition innovators have no peers.
同行评议创新是由于按照定义,创新者没有同行。
The panel is charged with producing conclusions by the end of August, which will then go out for peer review.
该小组负责在8月底之前形成结论,然后面世交同行审查。
Each article is subjected to a peer review to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the views expressed.
每篇文章都经过仔细审查,以确保所表达的观点的公平和准确。
Second, analysis the status of the evaluation of peer review experts and identifies the main problems.
分析我国科技项目立项同行评议专家反评价现状,找出存在的主要问题;
Open deposit of accepted manuscripts risks destabilising subscription revenues and undermining peer review.
典藏手稿有一定的风险,不但收入不稳定,而且破坏同侪评阅制度。
These users have crafted intellectual property rules, informal networks and peer review mechanisms that transcend borders.
这些用户创造了知识产权规则、非正式网络以及超越国界的同级评审机制。
Review CRU's policies and practices for acquiring, assembling, subjecting to peer review and disseminating data and research findings.
审查CRU在获取信息、搜集信息、提交给同行评审以及传播数据和公开研究成果方面的政策和习惯。
Professor Sir John Beddington is to head a peer review group that will analyse sources of data on ash concentrations.
贝丁顿教授率领同业评审团,将分析灰云成分的数据来源。
In the latter case, the submission becomes subject to anonymous peer-review by outside scholars of the editor's choosing.
在后一种情况下,提交成为受匿名同行审查通过编辑器的选择之外的学者。
Many published papers were flawed, despite leading medical journals' sometimes arrogant insistence on a high standard of peer review.
许多发表的论文中的观点是错误的,尽管前沿的医学期刊有时自大地坚称对论文进行了高标准的业内审核。
restricting the agenda of a technical or peer review advisory committee.
然而对技术或同行审议型委员会议题的限制,会有一些缺点。
All abstracts of the scientific sections will be submitted to a peer review process.
所有独立提交的论文摘要都将由组委会送出进行匿名评审。
However, experience shows that, without peer review, the quality of publications varies considerably.
然而,经验显示,没有同侪评阅,出版品的品质差异很大。
Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are not part of the editorial staff.
同行评审是一个重要的评估期刊投稿稿件的部分,评审专家并不属于编辑部。